ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Advancements in echocardiography for congenital heart defects (CHDs): a literature review.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital heart defects (CHDs) are the most prevalent congenital condition globally, affecting approximately 1% of live births and contributing to significant morbidity and mortality. While advancements in diagnostic imaging have improved early detection and management, CHDs remain a leading cause of infant mortality, particularly in low- and middle-income regions. Echocardiography has evolved as a cornerstone in CHD diagnosis, with traditional modalities such as 2D echocardiography, M-mode, and Doppler imaging providing essential structural and hemodynamic assessments. However, these conventional approaches have limitations in visualizing complex congenital anomalies. The emergence of advanced echocardiographic techniques, including three-dimensional echocardiography, fetal echocardiography, speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), and stress echocardiography (SE), has significantly enhanced diagnostic accuracy, preoperative planning, and long-term monitoring. Furthermore, recent innovations in artificial intelligence (AI), deep learning, digital signal processing, and contrast-enhanced echocardiography are revolutionizing the field by automating image analysis, improving image quality, and enabling predictive modeling for CHD prognosis. This review critically compares traditional and advanced echocardiographic modalities, evaluating their respective strengths, limitations, and impact on early CHD detection. Additionally, it explores emerging AI-driven technologies and their potential to optimize echocardiographic workflows, reduce diagnostic variability, and enhance patient outcomes. By synthesizing current evidence, this review aims to provide clinicians, researchers, and healthcare policymakers with insights into the evolving role of echocardiography in CHD diagnosis and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.