ArticleTranslational pediatrics2026
A prospective cross-sectional diagnostic feasibility study: musculoskeletal ultrasound for pediatric bone age evaluation.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ultrasonography offers several advantages in medical diagnostics, including the absence of radiation exposure, convenience, and real-time dynamic imaging. In this study, radiographic bone age assessment based on left-hand wrist X-rays was used as the reference standard to evaluate the feasibility and association with radiographic bone age of ultrasound for bone age estimation. Methods: This study was designed as a prospective cross-sectional diagnostic feasibility study. Children who underwent radiographic bone age assessment using left-hand wrist X-rays at a large tertiary hospital were enrolled. 139 children (63 boys and 76 girls) aged 3-16 years were recruited. Within 7 days, ultrasound examinations were performed on the metacarpals and phalanges of the first, third, and fifth fingers, as well as the ulna, radius, and femur. The longitudinal diameters of the ossification centers and epiphyses were measured, and the ossification ratio [OsR = ossification center length/epiphyseal length (d/D)] and skeletal maturity score (SMS) were calculated for each bone. Results: Ultrasound imaging clearly showed the ossification centers and epiphyseal cartilage. Radiographic bone age was correlated with the SMS of the metacarpals, phalanges, ulna, radius, and femur, with the strongest correlation observed between radiographic bone age and the combined skeletal maturity score (CMS) of the ulna, radius, and femur [boys: r=0.961, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.936-0.977; P<0.001; girls: r=0.962, 95 % CI: 0.940-0.976; P<0.001]. The URF (ulna + radius + femur) combination demonstrated the highest intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values and 95 % CIs in both the inter-observer and the intra-observer assessments, with an ICC of 0.99 and a 95 % CI of 0.98-1.00. Conclusions: In this study, the CMS of the URF were strongly correlated with Tanner-Whitehouse 3 radius-ulna-short bone (TW3-RUS) radiographic bone age, suggesting that ultrasound has potential research value in pediatric bone age assessment. Because agreement and prediction-error analysis was not performed, feasibility and association with radiographic bone age of this examination method for pediatric bone age assessment requires further validation through subsequent large-sample agreement studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.