ArticlePsychology research and behavior management2026
Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of Cognitive Style Questionnaire-Short Form Among University Students.
Article in Psychology research and behavior management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The Cognitive Style Questionnaire-Short Form (CSQ-SF) is a self-report measure of negative cognitive style. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the CSQ-SF among Chinese university students. Methods: Following approval of the Chinese translation by an original author, 3525 university students completed the CSQ-SF along with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), State-Anxiety Inventory (SAI), Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS), and Ruminative Response Scale (RRS). After a 5-week interval, 429 students completed the CSQ-SF twice. Confirmatory factor analysis tested a first-order five-factor model and a second-order single-factor model. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis examined the measurement invariance across gender and time. Internal consistency and convergent validity were assessed. Results: Both models of the CSQ-SF fit the data well. The first-order model showed measurement invariance across gender and time. Internal consistency (Cronbach's Conclusion: The Chinese version of CSQ-SF demonstrates acceptable psychometric properties and can be used to assess cognitive vulnerability in Chinese-speaking university individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.