ArticleClinical case reports2026
Regenerative Endodontic Procedure in Mandibular First Molar: A Clinical Case Report.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) have emerged as a biologically based treatment modality for managing immature permanent teeth with necrotic pulp, offering the potential for continued root development and periapical healing. This case report describes the regenerative endodontic treatment of a necrotic, immature mandibular first molar in a 9-year-old female patient. The treatment protocol involved canal disinfection using double antibiotic paste (DAP), induction of intracanal bleeding to form a natural scaffold, and coronal sealing with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). A 12-month follow-up demonstrated successful resolution of the periapical lesion, continued root maturation with increased root length and wall thickness, and clinical absence of symptoms. The extraoral sinus tract also healed completely within this period. This case highlights the clinical viability of REPs in immature multirooted teeth, emphasizing the importance of appropriate case selection, careful scaffold induction, and long-term monitoring. Although short-term outcomes were favorable, extended follow-up is necessary to fully validate the durability of regenerative success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.