ArticleThe journal of climate change and health
Towards circular healthcare: A qualitative exploration of approaches and implementation factors in Dutch hospitals.
Article in The journal of climate change and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Healthcare is a major contributor to environmental pollution, mainly due to high resource use and a linear supply chain. In the Netherlands, healthcare consumes 13% of all abiotic raw materials and produces 4.2% of national waste. Although optimizing resource use and minimizing waste through circularity seems the way forward, it remains poorly understood. This study (1) explores how hospitals in the wider Amsterdam region approach circularity, and (2) identifies factors influencing implementation. Methods: Semi-structured interviews, informed by an implementation framework, were conducted with hospital staff in roles relevant to circularity implementation. Interviews continued until data saturation. Verbatim transcripts were coded and thematic analysis was applied. Results: Nineteen staff from twelve hospitals were interviewed. Institutionalization of circularity varied widely, from structured approaches with strategies, coordination, monitoring, and budgets to more fragmented, project-based efforts driven by individual champions. Key factors influencing implementation included bottom-up motivation, top-down support, infection prevention, internal and external collaboration, supply-chain dependency, policies, and regulations. Conclusion: Hospitals in the wider Amsterdam region are motivated to contribute to the circular transition, with staff organizing green teams and other bottom-up initiatives with varying levels of organizational support. Yet bottom-up momentum alone is insufficient. Because environmental benefits of circularity accumulate largely at the societal level while hospitals bear operational, financial, and infection-prevention risks, progress requires stronger top-down engagement and system-level changes. Additionally, regulations and policies need to address the absence of affordable circular alternatives, dependence on incumbent linear-economy suppliers, and showcase co-benefits of circularity to hospital management, regulatory bodies, and health insurers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.