ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026
Efficient deep learning-driven workflows for accelerated single-fraction radiation therapy planning of a solitary tumour in the lung.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Same-day, single-fraction radiotherapy requires efficient planning. We introduce two deep learning (DL) dose prediction-driven workflows to generate clinically acceptable plans for treating metastases in the lung. Materials and methods: Consecutive patients treated for a tumour in the lung (11/2018-11/2024) were considered. One workflow used the computed tomography density map and a synthetic dose built from the tumour segmentation as inputs for the DL model [ Results: Training and testing datasets contained 200 and 56 treatments, respectively. Without- / with-OOI workflows generated plans in 8.8 and 9.6 min. The 3%/3 mm gamma passing rates between predicted and clinical doses were median ± interquartile range 99.4 ± 0.7% / 99.3 ± 0.8%. After dose optimisation in the TPS, 25% of plans had a higher number of achieved clinical goals relative to clinical plans in both workflows. The conformity was improved (CI Conclusions: Workflows driven by DL dose prediction could generate a clinically acceptable plan in less than ten minutes for same-day, single-fraction treatment of a tumour in the lung.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.