ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Development and internal validation of a clinicopathological and CT radiomics based prediction model for extracranial distant metastasis after radical resection in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Wide use of low-dose chest CT detects more early NSCLC, though recurrence (mostly extracranial distant metastasis) still occurs. This study aimed to establish and validate computed tomography (CT) radiomics models that can be used for predicting the risk of extracranial distant metastasis (EDM) after radical resection in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (e-NSCLC). Methods: This retrospective study included 312 patients with e-NSCLC who underwent radical surgery at Shandong Cancer Hospital from 2014 to 2019. The cases were randomly divided into a training set (n=200) and a validation set (n=112). The study excluded patients who received neoadjuvant therapy, had interrupted follow-up, or died of non-tumor-related causes. The patients were followed up for an average of 30.6 months after the first postoperative CT examination. This study defined EDM as distant metastasis in other organs other than brain metastasis after surgery, and accounted for 78.6% of all metastatic cases. The region of interest (ROI) was delineated, and the radiomics features were selected by using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression models to construct radiomics signatures. The association between the radiomics signature and the occurrence of EDM was also evaluated. A combined nomogram incorporating the selected radiomics and clinical-pathological predictors was constructed using multivariable regression. The concordance index (C-index) was used to evaluate the performance of the model. To determine the clinical effectiveness of nomogram in radiomics, the decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed. Results: A total of 75 patients (24.0%) experienced metastasis, with EDM accounting for 78.6%. In the overall cohort, radiomics signature were significantly associated with the occurrence of the EDM. The discrimination performance of the radiomics nomogram is significantly better than the clinical-pathologic nomogram (P<0.001), with the C-indexes 0.818 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.780-0.856] and 0.823 (95% CI: 0.769-0.877) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Analysis of the calibration and decision curves indicated that the comprehensive nomogram was superior to the clinical-pathological and radiomics nomogram in predicting EDM survival. Conclusions: CT radiomics features have the potential to predict postoperative EDM and may assist in preliminarily identifying patients at high metastatic risk, which could provide a reference for individualized postoperative adjuvant decision-making in e-NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.