ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2026
India's participatory approach to developing a national AI strategy for health: lessons for collective learning.
Review in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
National AI health strategies are proliferating, yet development methodologies remain largely undocumented, limiting collective learning. India's Strategy for AI in Healthcare (SAHI) was developed through a three-phase participatory process spanning situational analysis, regional consultations across four geographic zones, and structured synthesis engaging over 300 stakeholders. Documenting that process architecture for examination and adaptation by other countries is the methodological contribution of this paper. Consultation surfaced five system-level constraints recurring across emerging AI health ecosystems and drove a fundamental restructuring from prescriptive implementation planning to an enabling framework. A dual framework emerged separating technical prerequisites from governance and implementation conditions, with equity embedded as an operational requirement throughout. Rights-based regulation, market-led innovation, and state-centric control have dominated global AI governance debate. SAHI reflects a fourth approach, anchoring governance in shared digital public infrastructure rather than rules alone, and offers a distinct reference point for any country developing a health-specific AI strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.