Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42866166›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2026

India's participatory approach to developing a national AI strategy for health: lessons for collective learning.

Saif Khairat, Mayank Garg, Mona Duggal, Anurag Agrawal, Karthik Adapa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saif KhairatWorld Health Organization-South East Asia Regional Office, New Delhi, India.
Mayank GargWorld Health Organization India Country Office, New Delhi, India.
Mona DuggalIndian Council of Medical Research, National Institute for Research in Digital Health, New Delhi, India.
Anurag AgrawalKoita Centre for Digital Health, Ashoka University, Sonipat, Haryana, India.
Karthik AdapaWorld Health Organization-South East Asia Regional Office, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

National AI health strategies are proliferating, yet development methodologies remain largely undocumented, limiting collective learning. India's Strategy for AI in Healthcare (SAHI) was developed through a three-phase participatory process spanning situational analysis, regional consultations across four geographic zones, and structured synthesis engaging over 300 stakeholders. Documenting that process architecture for examination and adaptation by other countries is the methodological contribution of this paper. Consultation surfaced five system-level constraints recurring across emerging AI health ecosystems and drove a fundamental restructuring from prescriptive implementation planning to an enabling framework. A dual framework emerged separating technical prerequisites from governance and implementation conditions, with equity embedded as an operational requirement throughout. Rights-based regulation, market-led innovation, and state-centric control have dominated global AI governance debate. SAHI reflects a fourth approach, anchoring governance in shared digital public infrastructure rather than rules alone, and offers a distinct reference point for any country developing a health-specific AI strategy.

Indexed as

AI governanceLearning health systemsNational AI Strategy for HealthParticipatory methodology

Identifiers

PMID42866166
PMCPMC13656965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.