ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2026
Artificial intelligence and radiomics in small cell lung cancer: a narrative review of imaging and multisource data integration.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics are increasingly used to analyze imaging and multisource data in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), but the directness and clinical maturity of the available evidence remain uncertain. This narrative review aimed to summarize and critically evaluate SCLC-specific, mixed-cohort, and indirect evidence across diagnostic classification, prognostic prediction, treatment-associated outcomes, and lesion segmentation. Methods: A structured literature search was conducted to identify human studies evaluating AI, deep learning (DL), radiomics, or machine learning within imaging-based or imaging-integrated workflows. Studies were selected according to clinical relevance, directness of SCLC evidence, methodological strength, and reporting completeness, and were classified as SCLC-specific, mixed-cohort, or indirect/transferable evidence. Key Content and Findings: Direct SCLC-specific evidence was strongest for multicenter computed tomography (CT)-based prognostic models and lesion segmentation, whereas diagnostic classification relied mainly on mixed cohorts or public image-level datasets. Treatment-response models showed preliminary value but were predominantly retrospective and lacked prospective clinical validation. Retrospective studies suggested associations between model-derived risk scores and outcomes following prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI), but did not establish treatment-benefit prediction. Pathomic and radiogenomic analyses also identified associations between quantitative features, immune-cell infiltration, genomic alterations, and treatment response; these findings remain hypothesis-generating. Interpretation is limited by small SCLC cohorts, retrospective single-center designs, non-independent image-level analyses, and limited external validation and interpretability. Conclusions: AI and radiomics show potential in SCLC, particularly for CT-based prognosis and segmentation. However, treatment-response prediction, non-invasive subtype classification, and clinical decision support remain investigational and require prospective multicenter validation and patient-level external evaluation before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.