ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for second-line retreatment in esophageal cancer progressing after first-line immunotherapy: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Controversy continues regarding whether immunosuppressive agents can be used across treatment lines after disease progression on first-line immunotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) retreatment through real-world data. Methods: The clinical data of patients with esophageal cancer treated at The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology were retrospectively collected. All patients received first-line combination therapy with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors for more than 3 months, and following disease progression, received second-line therapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for at least two cycles. Treatment efficacy and safety were evaluated. Results: In the overall population, the median overall survival (mOS) was 10.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 9.5-10.5] and the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 4.4 months (95% CI: 4.1-4.5). The objective response rate (ORR) was 33.2%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 65.9%. The Cox regression model analysis identified first-line PFS >6 months as an independent prognostic factor for both second-line PFS and OS. Safety was manageable, and no treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that ICI retreatment showed measurable activity in a selected real-world cohort and deserves further evaluation in comparative studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.