ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Non-intubated uniportal video-assisted minor and major pulmonary resections: a single-center European experience in 163 selected patients.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (niVATS) avoids endotracheal intubation and one-lung mechanical ventilation. Whether this translates into clinically meaningful benefits compared with intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) requires comparative studies. Evidence from European centers, particularly for major pulmonary resections, remains limited. We evaluated technical feasibility and perioperative outcomes in a selected European niVATS cohort. Methods: This retrospective single-center observational study included consecutive patients selected to undergo niVATS between May 2018 and February 2025. The primary endpoint was intraoperative conversion to intubated anesthesia. Secondary endpoints included postoperative complications, chest tube duration, length of stay, reoperation, and 30-day mortality. Results: A total of 163 patients were included. Median age was 67 years and median body mass index (BMI) was 24 kg/m Conclusions: niVATS is feasible in selected patients across a broad spectrum of thoracic procedures in a high-volume European center. Lobectomy and increasing BMI are associated with a higher likelihood of conversion and should be considered during patient selection and perioperative planning. These descriptive findings do not establish comparative safety or clinical benefit versus intubated VATS; prospective comparative studies are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.