Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42866115›Full record

ReviewArrhythmia & electrophysiology review2026

Brugada Phenocopies: A Review of Mechanisms, Clinical Implications and Prognostic Considerations.

Marta Lorente-Ros, Álvaro Lorente-Ros, Mohammad S Husain, Travis Hong, Jessica Sweeney, Adrian Baranchuk, Susan O'Donoghue

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marta Lorente-RosDepartment of Cardiology, Georgetown University School of Medicine Washington, DC, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3081-9952
Álvaro Lorente-RosSection of Electrophysiology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias Asturias, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7319-270X
Mohammad S HusainMedStar Heart and Vascular Institute Washington, DC, US.
Travis HongKingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Jessica SweeneyDepartment of Cardiology, Georgetown University School of Medicine Washington, DC, US.
Adrian BaranchukKingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University Kingston, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3042-6569
Susan O'DonoghueDepartment of Cardiology, Georgetown University School of Medicine Washington, DC, US.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brugada phenocopy (BrP) is a clinical entity characterised by an identical ECG pattern to that of Brugada syndrome, albeit in the absence of congenital sodium channel dysfunction. In BrP, diagnosis is based on the presence of an identifiable underlying trigger that elicits the typical ECG pattern and non-reproducible electrical changes associated with the administration of sodium channel blockers. Although a wide variety of conditions can elicit BrP, the underlying electrophysiological mechanisms leading to the ECG changes are incompletely understood. Experimental models mimicking phenocopy-inducing conditions and integrative evidence of genetic and environmentally modulated mechanisms of sodium channel dysfunction are imperative to gain insights into the mechanisms behind BrP. In this review, we summarise current literature on BrP and describe aetiologies and reproducibility, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, prognostic implications and emerging evidence on the pathophysiological mechanisms behind the spectrum of phenotypes of sodium channel dysfunction that can help understand the phenomenon of BrP.

Indexed as

Brugada phenocopyBrugada syndromeSCN5Asodium channel dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID42866115
PMCPMC13655743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.