ReviewTranslational pediatrics2026
Rapid whole-genome sequencing in the pediatric intensive care unit: from etiologic diagnosis to precision management-a narrative review.
Review in Translational pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) with critical illness may have underlying genetic diseases that are difficult to distinguish from sepsis, hypoxia, shock, postoperative complications, medication effects, or secondary organ injury. Rapid whole-genome sequencing (rWGS) provides a broad genomic framework within clinically actionable timeframes. This narrative review aims to summarize the diagnostic scope, implementation workflow, and clinical utility of rWGS in critically ill children. Methods: A focused literature search was conducted in PubMed using terms related to rWGS, rapid genome sequencing, rapid exome sequencing (rES), PICU, critical illness, and critically ill children. Original studies, multicenter studies, and relevant consensus documents were considered, and the primary literature search was conducted on June 25, 2026, and the final update was performed on August 20, 2026. Key Content and Findings: Evidence from critical care cohorts indicates that rapid genomic sequencing can increase etiologic diagnosis and influence clinical management through disease-specific therapy, metabolic crisis management, adjustment of antimicrobial or immunomodulatory treatment, avoidance of contraindicated interventions, reduction of low-yield procedures, prognostication, and family risk counseling. Clinical utility depends on appropriate patient selection, rapid turnaround time, trio analysis when feasible, standardized phenotyping, and multidisciplinary interpretation. Conclusions: rWGS can support precision management in critically ill children when integrated into a structured PICU genomic pathway. Nondiagnostic results and variants of uncertain significance require continued reassessment and complementary testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.