ReviewUS cardiology2026
Cardiogenic Shock Systems of Care Best Practices. Part 2: The Shock Team and Inpatient Management.
Review in US cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper describes the contemporary inpatient management of cardiogenic shock, including critical care management and the use of mechanical circulatory support as part of a cardiogenic shock system of care. It highlights the importance of multidisciplinary shock teams for improving patient outcomes through advanced mechanical circulatory support systems and critical care management strategies. Drawing on successful models in trauma care, the paper discusses the evolution of specialized teams, the reduction of care variability, and the enhancement of survival rates through standardized best practices. A case study illustrates the effective implementation of these principles, resulting in improved short-term survival and long-term recovery for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.