Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42866050›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026

Vaccination of patients with hematological malignancies: barriers and strategies to improve uptake.

Toni Valković, Paolo Salamon, Vanja Vasiljev, Tomislav Rukavina

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Toni ValkovićSpecialty Hospital Medico Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Paolo SalamonSpecialty Hospital Medico Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Vanja VasiljevDepartment of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Sveuciliste u Rijeci Medicinski Fakultet, Rijeka, Croatia.
Tomislav RukavinaDepartment of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Sveuciliste u Rijeci Medicinski Fakultet, Rijeka, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination is one of the most successful developments in the history of medicine, having saved countless human lives. Although vaccination is of the utmost importance for patients with hematological neoplasms, it can also be challenging due to the often reduced or absent serological responses. Despite vaccination, breakthrough infections may occur among patients with hematological malignancies, particularly in those with impaired vaccine-induced immune responses. Although humoral responses are frequently impaired, vaccine-induced cellular immunity is preserved in a substantial proportion of patients with hematological malignancies and may contribute to protection against severe infections. Maximizing the immune response to vaccination requires optimal timing of vaccination relative to the administration of antineoplastic therapy. Patients may also fear vaccine side effects and worry that vaccination might influence their cancer therapy. Finally, some medical professionals, family members, and caregivers are insufficiently aware of the importance of vaccination for patients with hematological diseases, as well as their own vaccination. Despite significant developments in the field of vaccination of immunocompromised patients, addressing these challenges will require further high-quality clinical and translational research; continuous education of patients and healthcare providers; and enhanced cooperation and coordination among primary care practitioners, and epidemiological and hematological departments.

Indexed as

barriershematologyimmunityimmunocompromisedvaccination

Identifiers

PMID42866050
PMCPMC13655777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.