ArticleInternational journal of reproductive biomedicine2026
The impact of
Article in International journal of reproductive biomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Objective: This study examined how Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 130 asymptomatic men who were referred to Yas hospital complex in vitro fertilization center, Tehran, Iran, for infertility evaluation were enrolled after eligibility screening via a structured interview. Their semen samples were collected and analyzed. Microscopic and macroscopic examinations were performed using a computer-aided sperm analysis system and World Health Organization guidelines. The presence and number of leukocytes in semen were determined using the peroxidase staining method. For quantitative analysis, 2 semen samples were cultured simultaneously on blood and MacConkey agar. Results: The results of semen analysis in 2 groups of men with and without positive culture showed significant differences in most parameters. The frequency of Conclusion: Higher bacterial loads of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.