Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42865962›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of reproductive biomedicine2026

Prediction of chemical miscarriage in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies using machine learning: A developmental study.

Mohadese Zare Ebrahimabad, Mahdi Hashemzadeh, Nasim Tabibnejad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of reproductive biomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohadese Zare EbrahimabadFaculty of Information Technology and Computer Engineering, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran.
Mahdi HashemzadehFaculty of Information Technology and Computer Engineering, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran.
Nasim TabibnejadResearch and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early miscarriage is a common complication following assisted reproductive technology (ART), affecting 20-30% of conceptions and creating challenges for patient counseling and treatment planning. Accurate prediction remains difficult because of the multifactorial nature of miscarriage and variability in ART outcomes. Machine learning (ML) offers promising opportunities for individualized risk assessment. Objective: This study aimed to develop an ML-based framework for early prediction of chemical miscarriage in infertile women undergoing ART using only pre-treatment baseline clinical data. Materials and Methods: In this developmental study, clinical data from 3000 infertile couples who attended the Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Yazd, Iran, between March 2020 and September 2022 were extracted from medical records. After preprocessing, including missing data handling, outlier correction, normalization, and class balancing, a benchmark dataset of 1234 samples with 32 features were constructed and made publicly available. Multiple ML algorithms and feature selection methods were evaluated. Results: Across both imbalanced and balanced datasets using synthetic minority oversampling technique and adaptive synthetic sampling, the random forest model achieved the best performance, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 70.9%, 70.3%, and 70.8%, and corresponding accuracies of 82.2%, 81.1%, and 80.0%, respectively. 12 clinically relevant predictors were identified, including maternal age, body mass index, previous abortions, thyroid-stimulating hormone levels, sperm parameters, ART-related protocols, history of intrauterine insemination, and menstrual regularity. Conclusion: ML models, particularly random forest, can provide meaningful early prediction of miscarriage risk using baseline clinical data. The publicly available benchmark dataset supports reproducible research and future advances in predictive reproductive medicine.

Indexed as

Assisted reproductive technologyClassification.InfertilityMachine learningPredictionPregnancy loss

Identifiers

PMID42865962
PMCPMC13655629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.