ArticleInternational journal of reproductive biomedicine2026
Prediction of chemical miscarriage in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies using machine learning: A developmental study.
Article in International journal of reproductive biomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early miscarriage is a common complication following assisted reproductive technology (ART), affecting 20-30% of conceptions and creating challenges for patient counseling and treatment planning. Accurate prediction remains difficult because of the multifactorial nature of miscarriage and variability in ART outcomes. Machine learning (ML) offers promising opportunities for individualized risk assessment. Objective: This study aimed to develop an ML-based framework for early prediction of chemical miscarriage in infertile women undergoing ART using only pre-treatment baseline clinical data. Materials and Methods: In this developmental study, clinical data from 3000 infertile couples who attended the Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Yazd, Iran, between March 2020 and September 2022 were extracted from medical records. After preprocessing, including missing data handling, outlier correction, normalization, and class balancing, a benchmark dataset of 1234 samples with 32 features were constructed and made publicly available. Multiple ML algorithms and feature selection methods were evaluated. Results: Across both imbalanced and balanced datasets using synthetic minority oversampling technique and adaptive synthetic sampling, the random forest model achieved the best performance, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 70.9%, 70.3%, and 70.8%, and corresponding accuracies of 82.2%, 81.1%, and 80.0%, respectively. 12 clinically relevant predictors were identified, including maternal age, body mass index, previous abortions, thyroid-stimulating hormone levels, sperm parameters, ART-related protocols, history of intrauterine insemination, and menstrual regularity. Conclusion: ML models, particularly random forest, can provide meaningful early prediction of miscarriage risk using baseline clinical data. The publicly available benchmark dataset supports reproducible research and future advances in predictive reproductive medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.