Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42865937›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2026

Climate awareness and lower-meat eating among children and adolescents: potential behavioral pathways and contextual conditions.

Lu Xing, Xueqi Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lu XingSchool of Preschool Education, Changsha Normal University, Changsha, China.
Xueqi WuTaylor's Culinary Institute, Faculty of Social Sciences and Leisure Management, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate awareness is increasingly proposed as a motive for lower-meat eating, while research involving children and adolescents spans distinct outcomes, from knowledge and willingness to food provision and measured intake. This Mini Review synthesizes these outcome levels and the conditions that connect them. A targeted structured search of Web of Science and Scopus identified surveys, qualitative studies, message and food-education interventions, family and school provision studies, and nutritional analyses. Evidence was organized as climate-linked motivational, proximal behavioral, and intake-association evidence; provision- and intake-change evidence; and contextual or feasibility evidence. Climate-related motives coexist with health, taste, identity, convenience, and social norms. One preregistered study comprising two randomized message experiments reported changes in immediate sustainable choices and intentions. A cross-sectional youth analysis linked climate attitudes with current intake, retrospectively reported reduction, and future intention, whereas a provision-based family trial supplied the clearest within-study change in meat intake. Family gatekeeping, school-food systems, product acceptability, culture, affordability, nutrition, and equity shape opportunities across these routes. Age changes opportunities for dietary agency: decision control may be adult-led, shared, or youth-led within age groups and settings. Climate awareness therefore occupies one motivational position in a multilevel evidence map. Connecting motivation with acceptable, accessible, and nutritionally adequate food environments provides a testable framework for sustained dietary change.

Indexed as

adolescentsalternative proteinschildrenclimate awarenesslower-meat eatingschool mealssustainable diets

Identifiers

PMID42865937
PMCPMC13656206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.