ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Tumor microenvironment-driven immune evasion in triple-negative breast cancer: mechanisms, clinical challenges, and therapeutic opportunities.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive and clinically challenging breast cancer subtype defined by the absence of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 expression. Because these classical therapeutic targets are lacking, chemotherapy remains a central systemic treatment; however, TNBC is frequently associated with early recurrence, distant metastasis, immune escape, and therapeutic resistance. Growing evidence shows that these malignant features are strongly shaped by the tumor microenvironment (TME), a complex network of tumor cells, extracellular matrix, stromal cells, immune cells, vascular structures, cytokines, chemokines, and signaling mediators. Compared with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, TNBC often displays stronger immune infiltration and higher immune-checkpoint activity, suggesting an immune-inflamed phenotype in many cases. Nevertheless, immune-cell presence does not always produce effective antitumor immunity because TNBC can develop PD-L1 upregulation, alternative checkpoint activation, antigen-presentation loss, T-cell exhaustion, macrophage polarization, regulatory T-cell expansion, myeloid-derived suppressor cell recruitment, stromal immune exclusion, hypoxia, metabolic stress, epigenetic regulation, and exosome-mediated immune suppression. This review summarizes TME-driven immune evasion in TNBC, emphasizing molecular heterogeneity, hot and cold immune phenotypes, immunosuppressive cellular networks, PD-1/PD-L1 signaling, stromal barriers, metastatic immune escape, advances in clinical immunotherapy, adverse effects, and emerging TME-directed strategies. Understanding these mechanisms may support rational combination therapies, biomarker-guided patient selection, and individualized immunotherapeutic approaches for TNBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.