ReviewFrontiers in surgery2026
Indocyanine green fluorescence-guided surgery in acute settings: state-of-the art.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Operating in acute surgical settings is significantly different from elective surgery. One aspect is the complexity of acutely ill or injured patients with abnormal physiology, unoptimized comorbidities, and unplanned interventions. Traditional visual and tactile assessments of the surgical field anatomy and tissue viability have documented limitations. The need for integrated technology to augment such assessments is described. Indocyanine green fluorescence-guided surgery (ICG-FGS) is a promising tool, given its history, safety, low cost, and accumulated experience in elective settings for many surgeries, to help transform precision surgery into acute settings (trauma and emergency surgery). An updated review is needed based on new evidence outlining the current landscape of ICG in acute settings. Methods: We performed a comprehensive review of literature update in the last two decades through June 2026, covering PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and published societal guidelines, including, but not limited to, the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) consensus position paper and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) review. Results: ICG is applicable across the full spectrum of acute surgical care, classified under two principal functions: anatomical mapping (biliary, ureteric, thoracic duct, and vascular structures) and perfusion assessment (bowel and mesenteric ischemia, anastomotic perfusion, pancreatic necrosis, burns, soft tissue, extremity trauma, and organ injury). Emerging and less commonly reported applications include necrotizing fasciitis debridement guidance, traumatic brain injury monitoring, penetrating abdominal trauma, gonadal torsion, fistula detection, damage control surgery, and AI-augmented quantitative fluorescence. The WSES consensus and SAGES meta-analysis provided strong prospective validation to date regarding anastomotic leakage reduction. Current gaps include the absence of standardized dosing protocols in acute settings, limited randomized data, and the subjectivity inherent to qualitative fluorescence interpretation. Conclusions: ICG fluorescence-guided surgery is a safe, low-cost, and rapidly deployable adjunct for emergency surgery. Its breadth of applicability warrants wider consideration and integration into acute surgical workflows to inform surgical decision making based specific considerations including specific indications, evidence support, equipment availability, local expertise, workflow readiness and clinical judgement. Standardized protocols, prospective trials, objective and AI-powered quantification are the research priorities to further clarify its practical role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.