ReviewFrontiers in digital health2026
A scoping review of generative AI and digital twins in tackling loneliness during hospital-to-home transitions.
Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Loneliness is an important psychosocial concern for older adults and may be intensified during the transition from hospital to home, when established routines, professional contact, functional capacity, and social participation can change simultaneously. This scoping review examined how generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), AI-enabled technologies, and digital twins (DTs) have been investigated in relation to loneliness, social connectedness, and psychosocial support for older adults, with particular attention to their relevance to hospital-to-home transitions. Following Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and PRISMA-ScR reporting principles, six interdisciplinary databases were searched for English-language peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2026. Thirty-two primary studies were included in the final synthesis. Review-level publications were excluded from the primary synthesis and used separately to contextualize the broader technology landscape. The evidence revealed two largely separate research streams. Loneliness-focused studies predominantly investigated conversational agents, smart speakers, voice assistants, social and companion robots, large-language-model-supported systems, generative reminiscence, and AI-based loneliness detection, mainly in community, home, and long-term-care settings. In contrast, hospital-to-home studies primarily addressed continuity of care, rehabilitation, symptom communication, monitoring, personalized assistance, and service coordination, with loneliness rarely assessed as a primary outcome. Digital-twin applications relevant to loneliness were particularly limited and remained largely conceptual or design-oriented. No included study evaluated an integrated GenAI-DT intervention that continuously interpreted changing post-discharge context and used this information to personalize relational support within an accountable hospital-to-home care pathway. The principal gap is therefore not the absence of AI-enabled support, but the lack of integration between relational GenAI capabilities, context-aware sensing and digital-twin representations, and transitional-care services. Based on these findings, this review proposes a Relational Intelligence Ecosystem as an evidence-derived and theory-informed framework to guide the future design and evaluation of personalized, context-aware, and human-supervised smart services for older adults during hospital-to-home recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.