ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
Pressure-flow discordance in perioperative pulmonary hypertension: a mechanism-based review and provisional five-domain right-heart model for noncardiac surgery.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary hypertension increases perioperative risk because anesthesia, positive-pressure ventilation, bleeding, and surgical stress can rapidly disturb coupling between the right ventricle and the pulmonary circulation. Pulmonary artery pressure alone cannot distinguish successful unloading from loss of right-ventricular output. This narrative review integrates contemporary guidance, noncardiac surgical cohorts, right-heart physiology, echocardiography, and critical-care evidence and then proposes a provisional five-domain model. The domains are pulmonary vascular load; right-ventricular reserve and ventricular-arterial coupling; systemic perfusion; effective preload and venous congestion; and forward flow and oxygen delivery. The underlying physiology and most component management principles are established; the novel contribution is their longitudinal organization into pressure-flow trajectories, provisional dominant phenotypes, and timestamped intervention-response pairs. Evidence provenance is labeled as guideline or consensus, direct perioperative clinical data, extrapolated physiologic or critical-care evidence, or an unvalidated framework hypothesis. A measurement hierarchy separates quantitative cardiac-output estimates from stroke-volume trends and from downstream perfusion surrogates. Provisional classification requires a core directional pattern plus corroboration from independent domains and permits mixed or indeterminate states. Disease group remains decisive because the same trajectory may imply different hazards in precapillary, postcapillary, lung-disease, or thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. During controlled instability, one small matched intervention can test the working mechanism; during immediately life-threatening deterioration, parallel resuscitative actions take precedence. The proposed model must demonstrate reproducible classification and incremental value beyond contemporary clinical risk assessment, right-ventricular function, biomarkers, procedure characteristics, and conventional monitoring before it is used as a treatment algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.