ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2026
Discrepancy Between Preoperative and Intraoperative Central Corneal Epithelial Thickness During Alcohol-Assisted PRK.
Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the agreement between preoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived central corneal epithelial thickness (CET) and an intraoperative epithelial thickness estimate derived from optical coherence pachymetry (OCP) during alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 116 eyes of 58 consecutive patients who underwent bilateral myopic alcohol-assisted PRK between June 2020 and October 2021. Preoperative CET was assessed using anterior-segment OCT. The OCP-derived intraoperative epithelial thickness estimate was calculated as the difference between total corneal pachymetry readings obtained immediately before and after epithelial removal. Demographic, preoperative clinical, and refractive data, as well as intraoperative laser parameters, were collected. Results: Mean age was 26.31 ± 7.44 years (range, 18-45), and 63.8% of patients were female. Mean sphere and spherical equivalent were -3.49 ± 1.63D and -3.16 ± 1.63D, respectively. Mean preoperative OCT-derived CET was 53.2 ± 3.5 μm (range, 42-69 μm), whereas the mean OCP-derived intraoperative CET was significantly higher at 59.8 ± 14.8 μm (range, 21-99 μm; Conclusion: Preoperative OCT-derived CET and OCP-derived intraoperative CET demonstrate a systematic discrepancy and poor agreement during alcohol-assisted PRK. The intraoperative estimates were higher on average and substantially more variable than preoperative OCT measurements. These differences may have implications for surface ablation procedures, particularly transepithelial PRK, in which an assumed epithelial thickness profile is incorporated into treatment planning.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.