ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Liposomal bupivacaine versus ropivacaine thoracic paravertebral block for thoracoscopic atrial septal defect repair: analgesic efficacy and cardiac biomarker outcomes in a single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized trial.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Thoracoscopic atrial septal defect (ASD) repair, although minimally invasive, can cause substantial postoperative pain. Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) provides effective chest wall analgesia, and liposomal bupivacaine (LB), a long-acting local anesthetic with sustained release, may prolong analgesic duration. We investigated whether ultrasound-guided TPVB using long-acting LB improves postoperative analgesia without compromising cardiovascular safety compared with ropivacaine (RP). Methods: This randomized, assessor-blinded trial enrolled 94 patients undergoing thoracoscopic ASD repair, who were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ultrasound-guided TPVB with either LB or RP. Eligibility criteria included age 18-55 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) II-III, New York Heart Association (NYHA) II-III, and ejection fraction (EF) >50%. Randomization was computer-generated with sealed envelopes. Safety monitoring included continuous electrocardiography (ECG) for arrhythmias, with Clavien-Dindo grading and Naranjo causality assessment. The primary endpoint was the numerical rating scale (NRS, 0-10) pain score during coughing at 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included NRS scores at other time points, 72-h opioid consumption (morphine milligram equivalents, MME), time to first rescue analgesia, extended analgesia outcomes [postoperative days 4-7 (POD4-POD7)], perioperative hemodynamics, postoperative recovery, cardiac/inflammatory biomarker trajectories, and adverse events (with postoperative arrhythmias analyzed separately). Results: Baseline demographic, clinical, and intraoperative variables were well-balanced between groups (all P>0.05). Compared with RP, LB was associated with lower NRS pain scores at rest and during coughing from extubation through 72 h (all P<0.05), including the primary endpoint at 24 h. LB significantly reduced 72-h opioid consumption [median interquartile range (IQR) 7.5 (0, 42) mg Conclusions: In adults undergoing thoracoscopic ASD repair, LB-based TPVB provides superior early analgesia with sustained opioid sparing and shorter mechanical ventilation duration, without signals of increased cardiovascular risk, including postoperative arrhythmias. These findings support considering LB-TPVB as part of multimodal analgesia for thoracoscopic ASD repair, pending confirmation in larger multicenter studies. Trial Registration: ChiCTR2500112278, retrospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on November 12, 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.