ReviewJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2026
Halitosis and
Review in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Halitosis, a common clinical condition, is frequently associated with Aim: This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association between Methods: We searched major databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the Science Citation Index, up to March 2025. Literature screening and data extraction were conducted according to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Study quality was assessed using appropriate tools according to study design. Heterogeneity and risk of bias were analyzed using Stata 12.0. Subgroup analyses were performed to examine the relationship between Results: Of the 154 articles screened, 24 met the inclusion criteria, involving 5872 patients. The analysis revealed a significantly higher Conclusion: The findings suggest a significant observational association between
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.