ReviewNursing research and practice2026
Effects of Nurse-Led Interventions on Adherence and Clinical Outcomes Among Adults Receiving Noninvasive Ventilation: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Nursing research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is a cornerstone therapy for respiratory diseases, but its effectiveness depends on patient adherence, which remains suboptimal. Although nurses play a key role in NIV management, the effects of nurse-led interventions on adherence and clinical outcomes remain unclear. Objective: To evaluate the effects of nurse-led interventions on NIV adherence and clinical outcomes in adults. Methods: Six databases were searched from inception to January 2026 for English randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults receiving NIV. Two reviewers independently conducted study selection and data extraction. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool, and the findings were synthesized without meta-analysis. Results: Sixteen RCTs involving 1757 participants were included. Risk of bias ranged from low to high across studies. Interventions included health education, motivational and behavioral strategies, and follow-up support delivered face-to-face, by telephone, or via telehealth. Nurse-led interventions may improve NIV adherence, although the effects varied across intervention types and follow-up periods. Some studies reported improvements in symptom burden, emotional status, and selected health service outcomes, whereas findings on quality of life, self-efficacy, and healthcare utilization were inconsistent. Conclusions: Nurse-led interventions may improve NIV adherence, particularly when combining education with motivational and behavioral strategies and structured follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.