ArticleTranslational pediatrics2026
Development and internal validation of a nomogram for predicting flexible bronchoscopy utilization in children with lobar pneumonia caused by
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The recent resurgence of Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 345 children (aged 1 month-18 years) with serology-confirmed MP-related lobar pneumonia (January 2022-March 2025); those with congenital heart disease, immunodeficiency, or plastic bronchitis were excluded. Patients were divided into FB (n=171) and non-FB (n=174) groups based on whether FB was performed. Laboratory predictors were restricted to values obtained within 72 hours of admission and before the FB decision. FB was recommended if symptoms or signs persisted after ≥72 hours of standard therapy. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors, and a nomogram was constructed and internally validated by 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed by area under the curve (AUC), calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Viral coinfection [odds ratio (OR) =23.271, 95% confidence interval (CI): 9.299-64.900, P<0.001] was the strongest independent risk factor for FB utilization, while bacterial coinfection (OR =0.215, 95% CI: 0.088-0.507, P<0.001) and male sex (OR =0.146, 95% CI: 0.061-0.313, P<0.001) were independent protective factors. The nomogram incorporating these six variables demonstrated moderate discrimination (apparent AUC =0.741, 95% CI: 0.689-0.792; cross-validated AUC =0.705) and good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow P=0.56). At the optimal cutoff value of 0.56, the model had a sensitivity of 51.5% and a specificity of 85.1%. DCA demonstrated net clinical benefit over a "treat-all" strategy within a threshold probability range of 0.1-0.3. Conclusions: The nomogram showed modest ability to predict FB use in this single-center cohort, but its clinical utility for identifying children with lobar pneumonia caused by MP who truly require FB remains uncertain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.