ArticleWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2026
Artificial Intelligence-Optimized Image Biomarker Identification for Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma Diagnosis Using Image-Enhanced Versus White-Light Endoscopy.
Article in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to compare image feature identification and diagnostic performance between artificial intelligence-aided image-enhanced endoscopy (using the Storz Professional Image Enhancement System, SPIES) and conventional white-light endoscopy (WLE) for sinonasal inverted papilloma (SIP). Methods: A total of 163 patients were investigated using Storz Professional Image Enhancement System (SPIES) endoscopy (SPIES Spectral A[SA]/Spectral B[SB]) and WLE. From each patient, one or two images (only in the presence of bilateral lesions) were obtained, and a large number of potential features were extracted from WLE, SA, and SB. Independent t-tests and LASSO methods were used to feature selection. Machine learning (ML) models were trained and evaluated for each channel of images. Results: The Random Forest (RF) algorithm on SPIES SB mode achieved superior performance: accuracy = 0.86, sensitivity = 0.89, specificity = 0.83, AUC = 0.86, and Kappa = 0.71. SB significantly outperformed SA (accuracy = 0.77) and WLE (accuracy=0.75). ROC analysis confirmed SB's diagnostic superiority (area under curve [AUC]: SB = 0.86 vs. SA = 0.77, WLE = 0.75). Conclusions: SPIES SB mode demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy and AUC for SIP identification, highlighting its potential as a superior imaging modality. SPIES endoscopy exhibits superior diagnostic accuracy and predictive performance compared to conventional WLE in the diagnosis of SIP. However, the single-center design and limited sample size necessitate validation through multicenter studies with larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.