Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42865702›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2026

Artificial Intelligence-Optimized Image Biomarker Identification for Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma Diagnosis Using Image-Enhanced Versus White-Light Endoscopy.

Zhen-Xiao Huang, Cheng Li, Min Li, Ying-Hong Zhang, Gui-Min Zhang, Qian Huang, Zu-Fei Li, Michael T Chang, Bing Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhen-Xiao HuangDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5185-3842
Cheng LiDepartment of Otolaryngology Tsinghua University Hospital Beijing China.
Min LiDepartment of Diagnosis and Treatment of Thyroid Diseases Qingdao Hospital, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (Qingdao Municipal Hospital) Qingdao China.
Ying-Hong ZhangDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Peking University Third Hospital Beijing China.
Gui-Min ZhangDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Tianjin First Central Hospital Tianjin China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9042-4015
Qian HuangDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education Beijing China.
Zu-Fei LiDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0161-3311
Michael T ChangDepartment of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9519-5880
Bing ZhouDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3411-0537

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to compare image feature identification and diagnostic performance between artificial intelligence-aided image-enhanced endoscopy (using the Storz Professional Image Enhancement System, SPIES) and conventional white-light endoscopy (WLE) for sinonasal inverted papilloma (SIP). Methods: A total of 163 patients were investigated using Storz Professional Image Enhancement System (SPIES) endoscopy (SPIES Spectral A[SA]/Spectral B[SB]) and WLE. From each patient, one or two images (only in the presence of bilateral lesions) were obtained, and a large number of potential features were extracted from WLE, SA, and SB. Independent t-tests and LASSO methods were used to feature selection. Machine learning (ML) models were trained and evaluated for each channel of images. Results: The Random Forest (RF) algorithm on SPIES SB mode achieved superior performance: accuracy = 0.86, sensitivity = 0.89, specificity = 0.83, AUC = 0.86, and Kappa = 0.71. SB significantly outperformed SA (accuracy = 0.77) and WLE (accuracy=0.75). ROC analysis confirmed SB's diagnostic superiority (area under curve [AUC]: SB = 0.86 vs. SA = 0.77, WLE = 0.75). Conclusions: SPIES SB mode demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy and AUC for SIP identification, highlighting its potential as a superior imaging modality. SPIES endoscopy exhibits superior diagnostic accuracy and predictive performance compared to conventional WLE in the diagnosis of SIP. However, the single-center design and limited sample size necessitate validation through multicenter studies with larger cohorts.

Indexed as

machine learningrandom forestsinonasal inverted papillomaSPIES endoscopytexture features

Identifiers

PMID42865702
PMCPMC13655554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.