Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42865681›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in insect science2026

Diet-associated variation in the midgut bacterial communities of

Dong Li, Jianyu Wang, Dandan Zhang, Weichan Cui, Haijun Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in insect science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dong LiSchool of Grassland Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Jianyu WangSchool of Grassland Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Dandan ZhangSchool of Grassland Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Weichan CuiSchool of Grassland Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Haijun XiaoSchool of Grassland Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Gut microbiota can influence insect physiology and ecological interactions, but how botanically distinct host plants affect gut bacterial communities in polyphagous insects remains poorly understood. Methods: We investigated the midgut bacterial communities of Results: Dietary treatments were associated with differences in gut bacterial community structure. The MS group exhibited higher bacterial richness and diversity, whereas the CA group showed a relatively simplified bacterial community. Bray-Curtis-based PCoA and PERMANOVA indicated significant overall variation in community composition among dietary treatments, although exact pairwise PERMANOVA tests were not significant. Bacillota and Pseudomonadota were dominant across treatments, while the MS group showed increased representation of Actinomycetota-associated taxa. LEfSe identified Actinomycetota-related taxa as characteristic features of the MS group and Bacillota-related taxa as features of the AD group. PICRUSt2 suggested differences in predicted functional potential among dietary treatments, including pathways related to amino acid metabolism, metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, and xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism. Discussion: The results demonstrate diet-associated variation in the gut bacterial communities of

Indexed as

diet -microbiota interactionsgut bacteriamicrobial communitiespolyphagous pestpredicted microbial functions

Identifiers

PMID42865681
PMCPMC13655065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.