ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM)-based nanoformulations for cancer therapy: antitumor mechanisms, challenges, and future directions.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM)-derived compounds have anticancer potential because of their multi-component, multi-target actions and generally favorable toxicity profiles. Clinical translation, however, is limited by poor aqueous solubility, rapid systemic metabolism, and insufficient tumor-selective delivery. This review critically evaluates recent TCM-based nanoformulations developed to address these limitations and improve the therapeutic performance. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and EQUATOR guidance, PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for original studies published during the previous 5 years using terms including "TCM," "nanoformulation," and "anticancer." After screening 387 records, 81 studies covering 50 representative TCM compounds were included and assessed for the preparation methods, antitumor mechanisms, and translational barriers. Results: Relative to free compounds, nanoformulations frequently improved solubility, stability, apparent bioavailability, or the targeting efficiency of TCM constituents. Reported mechanisms included apoptosis, cell-cycle arrest, ferroptosis, immunogenic cell death, and tumor-microenvironment remodeling across breast, lung, colorectal, and other cancer models. Nevertheless, most evidence was derived from Conclusion: TCM-based nanoformulations represent a promising strategy for integrating traditional herbal medicine with modern cancer therapy. Despite these promising findings, substantial challenges remain in standardization, reproducibility, pharmacokinetics, long-term safety, manufacturing, and clinical validation. Future studies should prioritize head-to-head comparisons, quantitative biodistribution, clinically relevant models, and scalable manufacturing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.