ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Nonlinear and Vessel-Specific Association Between Coronary Artery Calcium Burden and Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Underestimation of Coronary Stenosis.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) introduces substantial artifacts in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Although calcification is classically associated with overestimation of stenosis severity, underestimation may be even more clinically hazardous because underestimation can lead to inappropriate deferral of revascularization. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the association between CAC burden and CCTA underestimation, with emphasis on vessel-specific anatomical heterogeneity. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 673 patients without known coronary artery disease who underwent both CCTA and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) within 90 days, yielding 2692 vessel observations. Underestimation was defined strictly at the vessel level as a CCTA stenosis grade lower than the corresponding ICA grade. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) were used to characterize the nonlinear association between CAC burden and the risk of underestimation. Within-patient clustering across the left main (LM), left anterior descending (LAD), left circumflex (LCX), and right coronary artery (RCA) was accounted for using generalized estimating equations (GEEs). Results: Any-vessel underestimation occurred in 389 patients (57.8%). Vessel-specific susceptibility varied markedly: LM, 3.0%; LAD, 27.9%; LCX, 29.3%; and RCA, 22.4%. RCS analysis demonstrated a significant nonlinear association between total CAC score and patient-level underestimation in the fully adjusted model ( Conclusions: The association between calcification burden and CCTA underestimation is nonlinear and strongly dependent on coronary territory. Since the RCS-derived odds ratio (OR) = 1, crossings depend on the median reference value (CAC = 301) and should be interpreted as markers of risk trajectory rather than absolute diagnostic cutoffs. Integrating total calcium burden with vessel-specific susceptibility may help mitigate the risk of missed severe stenosis on CCTA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.