ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Patient-level evaluation of smartwatch-based pain and dehydration detection in nursing home residents: a prospective observational study.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Nursing home residents are at high risk for underrecognized pain and dehydration, particularly those with cognitive impairment who cannot reliably self-report symptoms. Consumer-grade smartwatches capable of continuous physiological monitoring may help detect these conditions, but their feasibility in frail older adults remains underexplored, and evaluation strategies based on random splits of repeated time windows can yield optimistically biased estimates. We therefore evaluated the feasibility of continuous smartwatch monitoring in nursing home residents and explored whether machine learning models using smartwatch-derived data can detect pain and dehydration under patient-independent evaluation. Methods: In a prospective, observational feasibility study (VIENNESE) conducted at three Caritas nursing homes in Vienna, Austria (February to November 2024), 24 residents were enrolled, 16 began smartwatch monitoring and 13 completed the protocol and contributed sufficient data for analysis (1,414 labelled 120 min windows). Matched XGBoost classifiers were evaluated with nested leave-one-patient-out cross-validation, with hyperparameters tuned inside each fold on training participants only. Results: Pain detection showed a weak signal, with a mean per-patient AUC of 0.557 (range 0.533 to 0.599 across random seeds) and a pooled window-level AUC of 0.736 (0.662 to 0.784). For dehydration, discrimination remained at chance level (mean per-patient AUC 0.513, range 0.468 to 0.550; pooled 0.484, range 0.393 to 0.593). Discussion: Continuous smartwatch monitoring was operationally feasible in this population. The exploratory models point to a weak pain-related signal that merits evaluation in larger cohorts with stronger reference standards, whereas hydration status may require different sensing modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.