ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
From belief to resilience: mapping the longitudinal path of Traditional Paranormal Belief through optimism and Mental Toughness.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Although researchers have traditionally focused on the irrational nature of paranormal belief (PB), contemporary perspectives suggest it can serve adaptive psychological functions, including meaning-making and perceived control. However, the mechanisms through which PB relates to positive psychological functioning remain unclear. Noting this, the present study examined whether Traditional Paranormal Belief (TPB) and New Age Philosophy (NAP) influenced stress and well-being indirectly via optimism and Mental Toughness. Method: The study used a multiple time point design. 1,032 United Kingdom adults were assessed across three waves spaced four to 6 weeks apart. Participants completed measures of PB (TPB, NAP), optimism, Mental Toughness, perceived stress, and hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being. Using longitudinal path analysis with bootstrapped indirect effects, analysis tested two three-wave autoregressive mediation models. Results: TPB (not NAP) predicted outcomes indirectly through a sequential pathway involving optimism and Mental Toughness. Specifically, TPB was associated with lower stress and higher hedonic well-being via these mediators. Direct effects of PB on outcomes were small and inconsistent. Across models, optimism positively predicted Mental Toughness, which predicted lower stress and higher levels of hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being. Discussion: Findings indicate that PB operates as a distal cognitive framework that influences psychological functioning through indirect pathways. In particular, TPB appears to foster optimistic appraisals and strengthen Mental Toughness, which support resilience and well-being over time. These results demonstrate that the psychological value of PB lies in its role in mobilising psychological resources rather than exerting direct effects on outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.