ArticleFrontiers in ophthalmology2026
Distribution and factors associated with refractive errors among young adults attending ophthalmic clinics in Iraq: a multicenter cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To describe the clinic-based distribution of myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism among young Iraqi adults and to examine demographic, social, familial, and self-reported behavioral factors associated with myopia and high-severity refractive errors. Materials and methods: This multicenter, clinic-based, cross-sectional study included 4,340 consecutive young adult attendees at three tertiary ophthalmic centers. Right-eye sphere and cylinder values were standardized to minus-cylinder notation before spherical equivalent (SE), and refractive outcomes were derived. Subgroup percentages were calculated using the relevant subgroup denominator, and multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate associated factors. Results: In the analytic sample, myopia (SE ≤ -0.50 D) occurred in 51.2%, hyperopia (SE ≥ +0.50 D) in 37.0%, and astigmatism (|cylinder| ≥ 0.50 D) in 66.4%; astigmatism overlapped with spherical refractive status. Myopia was more frequent among women than men (53.6% vs 45.6%). In the adjusted model, female sex, age 28-32 years, a positive family history of refractive error, sleep duration ≤6 hours, and longer daily electronic-device use were associated with higher odds of myopia, whereas office work, manual work, and unemployment were associated with lower odds than student status. Conclusions: Refractive errors were frequent among young adults attending tertiary ophthalmic clinics in Iraq. The observed associations with demographic, familial, social, and behavioral factors provide clinically useful information for targeted refractive assessment, counseling, and service planning in young adults. Population-based longitudinal studies are needed to confirm the generalizability and temporal nature of these associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.