Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42865611›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026

Sarcopenia and cognitive impairment after hip fracture in older adults: a narrative review and conceptual rehabilitation framework.

Qi Han, Hong-Zhao Bai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Qi HanDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Panzhihua Central Hospital, Panzhihua, Sichuan, China.
Hong-Zhao BaiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hospital of Zhejiang People's Armed Police, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hip fracture in later life is followed by high mortality, incomplete recovery of mobility, and frequent loss of independence. Sarcopenia and cognitive impairment are common at presentation yet are often assessed and treated as separate determinants of recovery. This narrative review synthesizes evidence on their joint clinical impact, plausible links, and rehabilitation implications. In a 2025 rehabilitation cohort, independent ambulation was recovered by 60.8% of participants with both conditions versus 90.2% with neither; the combined phenotype was associated with a 57% lower likelihood of walking recovery. Recent studies also associate sarcopenia with postoperative delirium and early postoperative cognitive decline, whereas cognitive impairment is linked to more complications, less rehabilitation referral, and poorer function. Mechanistic translation remains incomplete: the FNDC5/irisin-BDNF axis has not been shown to mediate recovery in hip-fracture cohorts because target engagement, biomarker source, assay comparability, and perioperative confounding remain unresolved. We therefore propose an evidence-informed, phase-specific conceptual framework incorporating orthogeriatric assessment, delirium prevention, progressive resistance and task-specific exercise, individualized protein-energy support, cognitively adapted communication and motor learning, management of concerns about falling, and supported continuity after discharge. The framework integrates components supported by hip-fracture studies with recommendations extrapolated from broader geriatric guidance; it has not been validated as a complete care pathway for the combined phenotype. Future trials should include people with cognitive impairment, standardize sarcopenia definitions, measure rehabilitation exposure and adherence, and test whether targeting the combined phenotype improves patient-centered outcomes.

Indexed as

cognitive impairmentcomprehensive geriatric assessmentdeliriumhip fracturerehabilitationsarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID42865611
PMCPMC13655386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.