ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Optimizing microbial cellulase fermentation with FERM-AI: risk-aware machine learning framework for fermentation and contamination prediction.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Stability, yield, and interactions between variables in the process, combined with the risk of contamination, pose a challenge for optimization of microbial fermentation processes. In this work, FERM-AI, a novel risk-aware machine learning surrogate framework for benchmark evaluation of cellulase fermentation, is presented, comprising of yield prediction, contamination risk assessment and an interactive decision-support interface. Methods: The framework was tested with a benchmark set of 1,000 runs of fermentation, consisting of 20 fermentation runs from experiments and 980 synthetic fermentation runs to develop the methods. Biologically relevant process optimality, stress responses and interaction effects were captured using domain-informed feature engineering, and features were then selected and expanded using polynomial feature expansion. Cellulase yield prediction was analysed using multiple regression models such as Ridge Regression, Bayesian Ridge Regression, Huber Regression, Partial Least Squares (PLS) Regression, Gradient Boosting, Extra Trees, XGBoost and ensemble models; and contamination risk was modelled using imbalance-aware classification with SMOTE and ensemble learning. Results: The Huber Regressor outperformed the other algorithms with an R Discussion: The integrated framework is a proof-of-concept showing the potential of simultaneously modelling productivity and contamination risks, which can aid in the evaluation of fermentation operating conditions in a risk-aware fashion. The data used in the benchmark is synthetic, so the predictive results are meant to show the validation of the proposed surrogate modelling framework, and not that the predictive ability of the framework is of industrial scale. The framework will be validated in the future with bigger fermentation datasets obtained from experiments and expanded to the real-world fermentation process optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.