ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Selinexor enhances temozolomide efficacy in glioblastoma through modulation of multiple resistance-associated mechanisms.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Glioblastoma remains one of the most treatment-resistant cancers, and temozolomide (TMZ) resistance is a central barrier to durable clinical response. Inhibition of exportin-1 (XPO1) by selinexor has emerged as a promising strategy to overcome resistance in solid tumors; however, its ability to sensitize TMZ-resistant GBM cells and the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Methods: We evaluated selinexor and TMZ, alone and in combination, in three GBM cell lines with distinct TMZ sensitivity profiles (LN18, resistant; U87MG, moderate; LN229, sensitive), assessing viability, apoptosis, cell cycle distribution, MMR/survival gene expression, apoptotic protein levels, and long-term colony-forming capacity. Results: Selinexor potently sensitized GBM cells to TMZ across all three lines, with the most clinically meaningful effects observed in the TMZ-resistant background. The combination produced synergistic growth inhibition and robust apoptotic induction that neither agent achieved independently, driven by convergent suppression of MCL1 and BIRC6, partial restoration of mismatch repair gene expression, and CHK1-mediated checkpoint activation. Combination treatment induced nuclear p53 accumulation, markedly reduced BCL-2, and increased PARP cleavage, and durably suppressed long-term proliferative capacity. Discussion: These findings position selinexor as a mechanistically rational TMZ sensitizer in resistant GBM and support further preclinical and translational investigation of this combination strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.