ArticleNanophotonics (Berlin, Germany)2026
Engineering Low-Power Cavity-Coupled Plasmonic Nanotweezers.
Article in Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plasmonic nanoapertures extend optical trapping into the subwavelength regime; but quantitative design rules remain limited because trapping is often inferred from spectral responses or field enhancement alone. This work establishes a full-field analysis framework for designing plasmonic nanoaperture tweezers under coherent illumination and experimental restrictions. We studied the plasmonic responses of three complementary plasmonic platforms-nanohole, nanohole-nanodisk, and cavity-coupled nanohole-nanodisk arrays-and their nanotrapping performance on dielectric and metallic nanoparticles using three-dimensional electromagnetic simulations and Maxwell stress tensor calculations. The results show that the force landscape in the particle volume depends strongly on the plasmonic resonance strength, the nanoparticle material, and the interaction with the target nanoparticle. In particular, we found that the cavity-coupled plasmonic array represents the most promising nanotrapping platform, capable of stable nanotrapping of metallic nanoparticles even under low power budgets and modest optical systems. Finally, we introduce a multi-criteria figure of merit (FoM) to compare trade-offs among trap stability, particle detuning effects, optical load, and nanoparticle material response. These results provide design guidance for compact, low-input-power plasmonic nanotweezer devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.