ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2026
Divergent cellular responses to sciatic nerve crush versus transection: bilateral MYCN induction and distinct DRG neuronal responses.
Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Peripheral nerve injuries can produce regenerative or persistent-disconnection outcomes depending on the injury modality, but the underlying cellular responses and their effects on the central nervous system remain incompletely defined. Methods: We compared sciatic nerve crush (SNC; axonotmesis) and sciatic nerve transection (SNT; neurotmesis) in wild-type, AdvCre;Ai14, and MYCN-eGFP reporter mice. Longitudinal assessments included functional recovery, neuronal injury responses marked by ATF3, IB4-positive sensory-neuron responses, dorsal-horn microglial activation, and spinal MYCN-eGFP signal. Results: SNC was associated with partial, measure-specific functional recovery, a transient and self-limited ATF3 response, and a limited reduction in IB4-positive neuronal profiles. In contrast, SNT produced persistent axotomy-associated neuronal stress, a reduction in IB4-positive neuronal profiles, and more protracted dorsal-horn microglial activation. MYCN-eGFP intensity was significantly increased above sham levels bilaterally in spinal ventral-horn neurons after both SNC and SNT at postoperative day 7 (POD7), with the greatest acute amplitude observed after SNC. From POD7 to POD14, MYCN-eGFP intensity declined by more than 90% after SNC but by approximately 60% after SNT, indicating distinct temporal patterns between the two injury modalities. Discussion: SNC and SNT engage overlapping but quantitatively and temporally distinct cellular programs, including modality-specific dorsal root ganglion neuronal responses associated with functional recovery. These findings refine the interpretation of two widely used peripheral nerve injury models and identify bilateral spinal MYCN-eGFP dynamics as a candidate cellular readout for future mechanistic investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.