Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42865578›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2026

Longitudinal Functional Outcomes After Transoral Robotic Surgery Versus Transoral Videolaryngoscopic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

Kazufumi Obata, Kenji Okami, Kaori Zenba, Takane Watanabe, Mayu Yamauchi, Hiroaki Iijima, Koji Ebisumoto, Akihiro Sakai, Koichiro Wasano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kazufumi ObataDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Tokai University School of Medicine Isehara Kanagawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6146-4755
Kenji OkamiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Tokai University School of Medicine Isehara Kanagawa Japan.
Kaori ZenbaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Tokai University School of Medicine Isehara Kanagawa Japan.
Takane WatanabeDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Tokai University School of Medicine Isehara Kanagawa Japan.
Mayu YamauchiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Tokai University School of Medicine Isehara Kanagawa Japan.
Hiroaki IijimaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Tokai University School of Medicine Isehara Kanagawa Japan.
Koji EbisumotoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Tokai University School of Medicine Isehara Kanagawa Japan.
Akihiro SakaiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Tokai University School of Medicine Isehara Kanagawa Japan.
Koichiro WasanoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Tokai University School of Medicine Isehara Kanagawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7335-3622

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Direct comparisons of functional outcomes between transoral videolaryngoscopic surgery (TOVS) and transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal cancer remain limited. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 35 patients who underwent TOVS and 13 who underwent TORS. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-H&N35, and Hyodo scores were assessed preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. A linear mixed-effects model (LMM) included time, treatment, the group-by-time interaction, T stage (Tis/T1/T2 vs. T3), anatomic subsite (Tonsil vs. not Tonsil), prior cancer-directed treatment, concurrent neck dissection, sex, and age. Results: Both groups showed transient postoperative deterioration followed by recovery. In the prespecified primary longitudinal LMM, treatment had no statistically significant main effect on pain, opening mouth, swallowing, or total Hyodo score. Conclusion: In this cohort, no statistically significant differences in postoperative quality of life or swallowing recovery were detected between TOVS and TORS. This design does not establish functional equivalence; however, TOVS may be a practical transoral option when robotic systems are unavailable. Level of Evidence: 3.

Indexed as

oropharyngeal cancerquality of lifeswallowingtransoral robotic surgerytransoral videolaryngoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID42865578
PMCPMC13655305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.