ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2026
Longitudinal Functional Outcomes After Transoral Robotic Surgery Versus Transoral Videolaryngoscopic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Direct comparisons of functional outcomes between transoral videolaryngoscopic surgery (TOVS) and transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal cancer remain limited. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 35 patients who underwent TOVS and 13 who underwent TORS. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-H&N35, and Hyodo scores were assessed preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. A linear mixed-effects model (LMM) included time, treatment, the group-by-time interaction, T stage (Tis/T1/T2 vs. T3), anatomic subsite (Tonsil vs. not Tonsil), prior cancer-directed treatment, concurrent neck dissection, sex, and age. Results: Both groups showed transient postoperative deterioration followed by recovery. In the prespecified primary longitudinal LMM, treatment had no statistically significant main effect on pain, opening mouth, swallowing, or total Hyodo score. Conclusion: In this cohort, no statistically significant differences in postoperative quality of life or swallowing recovery were detected between TOVS and TORS. This design does not establish functional equivalence; however, TOVS may be a practical transoral option when robotic systems are unavailable. Level of Evidence: 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.