ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Applications of episodic future thinking in patients with chronic diseases: a scoping review.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with chronic diseases require long-term self-management, but adherence and sustained behavior change remain major challenges in nursing practice. Episodic future thinking (EFT) is a cognitive strategy that may influence intertemporal decision-making and health-related behaviors by increasing the salience of future outcomes. However, its application, implementation, and clinical translation across chronic disease populations have not been comprehensively synthesized. Therefore, this scoping review aimed to map the use of EFT among adults with chronic diseases, characterize its intervention components and delivery models, and examine the extent to which existing evidence extends beyond short-term cognitive and decision-making outcomes to include health behaviors and clinically relevant outcomes, thereby informing future research and clinical translation. Methods: This scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WANFANG DATA, VIP, and SinoMed from database inception through October 2025. The methodological quality of the included studies was appraised using the 2018 Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Results: Twenty studies were included, primarily involving populations with metabolic conditions; few focused on breast cancer, heart failure, or chronic pain. EFT interventions were grouped into two types: general EFT and goal-oriented EFT. Most intervention protocols included three core components: cue generation, cue appraisal, and episodic imagery training. Cue design, intervention duration, training frequency, and delivery modality varied considerably. Outcomes were categorized into four domains: decision-making and cognitive function, health-related behaviors, psychological well-being and motivation, and clinical and physiological outcomes. Evidence was strongest for proximal cognitive outcomes, particularly delay discounting, whereas behavioral outcomes were examined primarily in relation to dietary behaviors. Evidence regarding other self-management behaviors and clinically relevant outcomes was comparatively limited. Conclusion: Existing evidence suggests that EFT has potential for application in populations with metabolic conditions, but its applicability to other chronic diseases requires further validation. Overall, the field remains in transition from experimental exploration to clinical translation. Future research should focus on optimizing intervention protocols for specific diseases and populations, identifying essential intervention components, extending intervention and follow-up durations, and evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of digital delivery approaches within chronic disease management. Systematic review registration: OSF registration: https://osf.io/rq9z7/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.