ArticleInternational journal of public health2026
Considering young and socially marginalized people in urban revitalization: evidence on enablers and barriers from a mid-size Canadian city.
Article in International journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study explored what enabled and constrained consideration of young and socially marginalized people's needs and interests in the downtown revitalization of a mid-size Canadian city. Methods: In this interpretive descriptive study, we conducted nine semi-structured interviews with 10 key informants from the municipal, community organization and private sectors involved in the revitalization initiative. We analyzed interview transcripts following the framework method to identify main themes. Results: According to participants, young and socially marginalized people's needs and interests were not explicitly considered since the initiative predominantly aimed to improve the downtown physical and economic environment. Participants were, however, open to collaborate for a more equitable and inclusive revitalization, but diverging perspectives on (1) reasons for revitalizing the downtown, (2) how "young" and "socially marginalized" people were implicitly defined, (3) collaborative structures and mechanisms, and (4) public participation processes and strategies, constrained fulsome consideration of these groups. Conclusion: The factors we identified as enabling and constraining consideration of young and socially marginalized people who experience neighbourhood revitalization firsthand can serve as a springboard to devise solutions for inclusive and health-promoting urban planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.