ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Specific learning disorders and underlying processes: can WISC-IV subtests predict SLD neurocognitive profiles in Italian children aged 7-14 years?
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Specific Learning Disorder (SLD) is studied via WISC IV, as well as via neurocognitive impairment profiles arising from clinical tests. However, state-of-the-art appears to be deficitary about the possibility of shared neurocognitive profiles within a given phenotype. Objectives: We aim to fulfil this gap by investigating, in SLD, formal correlations between WISC IV subtests and nine impairment domains, with their own degrees of severity. Participants and methodology: 160 Italian children, aged 7 to 14 years, have been divided in four groups (Males vs. Females; Primary vs. Lower Secondary School); scores obtained in nine specific domains of abilities have been confronted versus WISC IV scales, using Pearson R correlations, and obtaining 15 × 9 matrices for each group. Results: The most relevant correlations have been found in the primary-school group only, and in the female group only. The primary-school children presented a strong correlation of WMI with handwriting and reading. On the other hand, in the female group, mental calculation abilities correlated to several subtest indexes, such as: IQ; VCI; WMI. Reading comprehension abilities also correlated to WMI. Interpretations: A possible explanation to neurocognitive profiles in females is represented by fronto-parietal networks: anomalies in gray-to-white matter ratio, in gray-matter depth, and in white-matter tracts appear to be typical of young females. Results found in the primary-school group underline the developmental role of working memory in learning how to properly read and write. Thus, specific phenotypic areas are implicated in deficitary neurocognitive networks affected in children with SLD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.