ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Psychopathology and literary creativity: a pathographical mixed-methods analysis of the tang dynasty poet Li Bai.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Tang dynasty poet Li Bai (701-762 CE) is renowned for extraordinary literary creativity. Traditional historical perspectives frequently link his "Poet Immortal" reputation to alcohol-associated euphoria. We examined whether temporal fluctuations in his creative output co-occurred with biographical and textual features compatible with mood-spectrum psychopathology, while considering alcohol use and major life events as alternative explanations. Methods: This retrospective pathographical mixed-methods study analyzed Li Bai's literary corpus and biographical archives. Annual creative output was quantified for 836 securely dated poems across a 48-year career. Years exceeding 2 SDs above the career mean were used as data-derived anchors for episode-centered qualitative review. We additionally calculated the proportion of the corpus produced in peak years and a peak-to-nonpeak productivity ratio. Literary and historical evidence was then mapped to DSM-5 mood-episode symptom domains, with explicit attention to temporal fit and competing situational explanations. Results: Annual productivity showed three extreme-output years: 743 CE ( Conclusion: Li Bai's creative output was highly episodic, and the identified productivity bursts temporally overlapped with certain literary and biographical characteristics consistent with mood elevation. Therefore, the combination of genius and bipolar disorder is more likely to explain Li Bai's literary achievements, rather than the combination of genius and alcohol. Li Bai's case should no longer be used as a positive example of drinking in the name of "creativity".
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.