ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
The real experience and coping styles of emergence delirium in patients after radical lung cancer surgery: a qualitative study.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Emergence delirium (ED) is a prevalent and complex complication in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) that significantly impacts patients undergoing radical lung cancer surgery. Despite its high incidence, the subjective experience of ED, along with patients' coping strategies and support needs, remains insufficiently understood. This study aims to address this gap by exploring the real experiences of patients who develop ED following radical lung cancer surgery. Methods: To gain an in-depth understanding of the real experience of emergence delirium in patients after radical lung cancer surgery, a qualitative descriptive phenomenological study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Sichuan, China. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were performed with 15 patients who experienced ED after radical lung cancer surgery. Data were analyzed using Colaizzi's seven-step method to extract significant statements and formulate themes. Results: Participants described ED as a distressing experience characterized by intense perceptual disturbances, including audiovisual hallucinations, temporal-spatial and situational disorientation, and uncontrollable behavioral abnormalities. Participants described complex emotional responses during the episode: most reported intense fear, anxiety, and anger during the acute phase, followed by persistent feelings of shame and guilt after the episode, while a minority exhibited neutral or even euphoric moods. Coping patterns diverged: some chose to avoid and forget the experience, while others actively sought to understand its causes. Furthermore, ED episodes resulted in significant lasting consequences, including varying degrees of memory impairment, damaged self-esteem, and fear of recurrence. Finally, participants consistently expressed unmet support needs, primarily family companionship, psychological counseling, and clear explanations about ED from healthcare providers. Conclusion: ED is experienced by patients as a complex event marked by intense perceptual disturbances, loss of bodily control, and profound negative emotions including fear and shame. Patients mobilize both avoidant and positive meaning-seeking coping strategies. These findings underscore the urgent need for systematic ED screening, acute-phase acceptance-based bedside care, clear post-episode communication, family involvement, and individualized follow-up to support comprehensive psychological and physical recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.