SynthesisFrontiers in digital health2026
Artificial intelligence for pneumonia diagnosis: a systematic review of multimodal learning, fusion strategies, and explainability.
Synthesis in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pneumonia remains a major global public health challenge, particularly among children, older adults, and individuals with weakened immune systems. Although deep learning has made great progress in automated pneumonia diagnosis, most current methods are unimodal, using only chest X-ray images. This results in limited robustness, cross-institutional generalization and clinical applicability. Moreover, the current reviews mainly focus on summarising single data modalities or model architectures and lack comparative analysis of multimodal fusion strategies, explainability methods, benchmark datasets, and new artificial intelligence paradigms. To fill these gaps, this systematic review offers a common analytical framework for systematically comparing multimodal deep learning architectures, fusion strategies, explainability methods, benchmark datasets, and emerging technologies in the field of artificial intelligence for pneumonia diagnosis. Research articles were systematically reviewed to identify the latest developments, technological challenges, and future research directions. Evidence suggests that multimodal models can provide information from different sources and may improve diagnostic performance in specific settings. However, direct comparisons between studies are limited by differences in datasets, clinical tasks, and validation protocols. Attention-based and hybrid fusion strategies can learn useful information from various modalities. Explainable artificial intelligence methods provide mechanisms for improving the transparency and interpretability of model predictions.The clinical translation is still limited, however, due to the lack of large-scale multimodal datasets, data heterogeneity, missing modalities, inconsistent evaluation protocols, and lack of external validation. In summary, this review summarizes the current research trends, outlines important technological challenges, and provides a research agenda for the future to build strong, interpretable, and clinically viable artificial intelligence systems for next-generation pneumonia diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.