ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Bilateral knee-load limiting during uneven-terrain walking induces hip-dominant load redistribution in predictive gait simulations.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Knee pain may induce protective gait patterns that reduce knee loading, but the multi-joint trade-offs that emerge under uneven-terrain demands remain uncertain. Methods: Using SCONE/Hyfydy, we generated sagittal-plane predictive simulations over a deterministic ten-tile terrain sequence. A reflex-based controller was optimized under no knee-load limit (C0) or bilateral soft limits of 4, 3, or 2 body weights (C4, C3, and C2). We retained the lowest-objective solution from 24 runs per condition and reanalyzed every complete stance within 1-12 s by limb and terrain. Results: The C0 knee joint-reaction-force peaks of 8.35/8.25 BW (left/right) occurred during early stance on tile 9 (-4°) and tile 10 (-2°), respectively. The left peak arose in a stance confined to tile 9, whereas the right peak arose in a stance that crossed the tile 9-to-10 boundary; neither occurred during initialization. Corresponding maxima were 4.51/4.34 BW in C4, 3.63/3.71 BW in C3, and 3.60/3.73 BW in C2. Mean stance impulse decreased from 2.14/2.00 BW·s in C0 to 1.79/1.82, 1.65/1.69, and 1.58/1.59 BW·s in C4, C3, and C2, respectively. Evaluation-window mean hip loading increased and speed decreased, whereas initial loading rate did not change monotonically. The selected solution ranked first by objective in every condition; 5-17 of 24 runs were within 10% of the selected objective. Conclusion: Within this model, controller, weighting scheme, and single terrain traversal, knee-load limiting was associated with slower walking, lower stance-phase knee peaks and impulses, and hip-dominant redistribution. These results are scenario-specific model behaviors rather than direct clinical predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.