ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Development and internal temporal validation of an explainable XGBoost model for predicting clinical pregnancy after frozen embryo transfer.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Key message: An explainable machine learning model was developed using comprehensive clinical variables to predict clinical pregnancy outcomes following frozen embryo transfer. Compared with conventional statistical models, the extreme gradient boosting-based model showed numerically higher discrimination and provided interpretable insights through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis, supporting individualized decision-making in reproductive medicine. Research question: Can an interpretable XGBoost-based model leveraging multi-feature clinical data better predict pregnancy outcomes after frozen embryo transfer (FET) compared to conventional logistic regression? Design: This retrospective single-center study included 1,319 patients who underwent FET. Participants were temporally split into a training cohort (n=1,013) and a temporal validation cohort (n=306) according to the date of embryo transfer. Pre-transfer demographic, hormonal, treatment, and ultrasonographic variables were collected. An XGBoost model was developed and compared with logistic regression by assessing discrimination (area under the ROC curve [AUC] and area under the precision-recall curve [AUPRC]), calibration (calibration curves, Brier score, intercept, and slope), and clinical utility using decision curve analysis (DCA). Model interpretability was evaluated using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results: The XGBoost model achieved an AUC of 0.854 (95% CI 0.832-0.877) in training and 0.722 (95% CI 0.666-0.779) in temporal validation, with corresponding AUPRC values of 0.840 and 0.707. Calibration in the temporal validation cohort was acceptable (Brier score 0.212; calibration intercept 0.056; slope 0.965). DCA indicated a positive net benefit across clinically relevant thresholds, with high sensitivity at a representative probability threshold of 0.30. SHAP visualizations provided feature-level and individual-level explanations. Conclusion: Using single-center data, we developed and internally, temporally validated an explainable XGBoost model for predicting clinical pregnancy after FET. The model delivers accurate, interpretable predictions that may support personalized decision-making and facilitate the clinical integration of artificial intelligence into assisted reproductive medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.