Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42865416›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026

Nutritional potential of invasive

Kaifeng Zhao, Carla Cameselle, Celia Costas, Weronika Orzechowska, Łukasz Woźniak, Beatriz Rodríguez-Martínez, M Teresa Cesário, Jesus Simal-Gandara, Paz Otero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kaifeng ZhaoDepartment of Analytical and Food Chemistry, Universidade de Vigo, Faculty of Science, Ourense, Spain.
Carla CameselleDepartment of Analytical and Food Chemistry, Universidade de Vigo, Faculty of Science, Ourense, Spain.
Celia CostasDepartment of Analytical and Food Chemistry, Universidade de Vigo, Faculty of Science, Ourense, Spain.
Weronika OrzechowskaDepartment of Food Safety and Chemical Analysis, Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology - State Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Łukasz WoźniakDepartment of Food Safety and Chemical Analysis, Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology - State Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Beatriz Rodríguez-MartínezInstituto de Agroecoloxía e Alimentación (IAA), Universidade de Vigo, Campus Auga, Ourense, Spain.
M Teresa CesárioDepartment of Bioengineering, iBB-Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Jesus Simal-GandaraDepartment of Analytical and Food Chemistry, Universidade de Vigo, Faculty of Science, Ourense, Spain.
Paz OteroDepartment of Analytical and Food Chemistry, Universidade de Vigo, Faculty of Science, Ourense, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macroalgae are increasingly considered sustainable resources for protein-oriented food and bioprocessing applications due to their rapid growth, wide availability, low freshwater and fertilizer requirements, and potential as natural sources of proteins and bioactive compounds. However, integrated assessments comparing native, invasive, and industrial side-stream macroalgal biomasses under the same nutritional and safety framework remain scarce, limiting the identification of suitable candidates for protein-oriented valorization. In this context, this study assessed seven Atlantic macroalgal biomasses from Spanish and Portuguese sources: the invasive brown seaweed

Indexed as

Cystoseira usneoidesfatty acidsfull nutritional characterizationphenolic compoundsprotein quality

Identifiers

PMID42865416
PMCPMC13654835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.