SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2026
Topical herbal medicine as treatment for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common neurological complication of cancer treatment that worsens function and quality of life. Topical herbal medicines are increasingly used as localized interventions for neuropathic symptoms; however, their clinical efficacy remains uncertain. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of topical herbal formulations for CIPN in cancer populations. Methods: We systematically searched Scopus, MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials assessing the use of topical herbal formulations in adults with CIPN. Outcomes included validated measures of CIPN pain, overall severity, sensory function, and adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool implemented in RevMan 5.3, and all procedures were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Results: Five trials involving 201 participants were included, with an overall moderate risk of bias due to limited blinding and underpowered sample sizes. In breast cancer patients, henna vs. standard care significantly improved the overall severity of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy, as measured by the CIPN Assessment Tool ( Discussion: Despite modest benefits from certain herbal treatments in reducing CIPN pain and sensory symptoms, current evidence is limited by small sample sizes, methodological heterogeneity, and the lack of objective outcome measures. Rigorous, adequately powered RCTs with objective CIPN measurements are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.